Quick definition: A fact boundary separates what the applicant can verify from what AI may reasonably infer, simulate, or suggest for revision.
What it means for G5 applications
It keeps AI assistance useful without letting it create false evidence or misrepresent the applicant.
How applicants commonly misuse it
Applicants may allow reasonable-sounding inferences to become factual claims.
Good vs weak usage
- Stronger: The draft marks simulated examples and requires applicant confirmation before any factual claim is used.
- Weaker: The draft turns a general interest into a claimed internship responsibility.
Where it appears in the workflow
This term belongs to AI boundaries. In G5Admissions, it normally connects to the workspace step where saved applicant context, programme evidence, writing strategy, review, or interview practice is reused.
Related terms
FAQ
Is Fact Boundary the same as a polished sentence?
No. It is part of the application logic. The wording matters only after the claim, evidence, and programme fit are defensible.
How should I use this term when preparing my application?
Use it as a check on whether your profile, programme choice, materials, and interview answers support the same admissions story.
